So is there any good news to be had? The answer is, yes...though some of it you may have to make for yourself.
Good news: the commuter culture is coming to a close. Finally, the utter insanity of spending the equivalent of an entire waking day in an automobile each week going to and from work so you can (among other things) pay for the gas to make the trip is being exposed for all to see. Fathers might actually start arriving home in time to do something other than nuke a microwaveable dinner and tuck their kids in. We might actually (gasp!) get home from a day's work while there's still daylight, at least March through October or so. Families might actually start spending time together again. Family dinners, anyone?
Good news: energy conservation and alternative energy are finally being taken seriously. Even when gas was $1.78 a gallon, deep down inside we all knew it couldn't last. Someday we knew the cheap ride was coming to an end. Yet it was all too expedient for politicians to punt the ball and leave solving the problem to future generations. Now the ball has come to rest. Sure it's painful, but finally the foundation is being laid for America to have an energy source that doesn't enrich people who hate us, doesn't pollute, and that will last forever. That source is likely to be thermonuclear fusion (unless there's a real technological breakthrough and we come up with cold fusion, zero-point energy, or total mass conversion). The technical hurdles to harnessing any of these energy sources are formidable, but even a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. Despite the malingering of two generations of politicians, that step is now being taken.
Good news: our cities and towns are going to be reinvigorated. As life becomes more local, people will be looking more and more to the communities they live in for entertainment, recreation and economic sustenance. Look for fewer anonymous, cookie-cutter suburbs, and more vibrant city plans that mix residential and commercial development. After virtual extinction during the automobile-driven mid-to-late 20th century, the concept of civic space is experiencing a renaissance. Local forms and venues of entertainment--harvest festivals, farmer's markets, county fairs, carnivals, Christmas festivals, small dance halls, bowling alleys, movie theaters, local attractions, even libraries--the localization of our lives in the next decades will breathe new life into these venerable American traditions. One man who has minced no words about these trends is James Howard Kunstler.
Good news: our food is going to become more nutritious. Why? We'll be growing more of it ourselves and relying less on mass-produced, processed mega-foods. Prices may be zooming at the grocery store, but raising your own fruits and veggies isn't much more expensive than it was ten years ago. Even an apartment balcony can grow a surprising amount of food. Enterprising locals are making money selling tomatoes to local restaurants since salmonella fears have severed conventional supply lines for this ubiquitous food.
If you have a yard, even a small one, growing a garden opens up all kinds of possibilities for not only your own sustenance, but bartering with neighbors for their produce or even other goods and services. Now would also be a good time to plant fruit trees, especially citrus and other tropical fruits, as these take several years to become productive. Even if they have to be grown indoors in pots because you live in a cold climate, they can be nurtured with highly efficient shop lights, and moved outside when danger of frost is past.
Good news: more and more of us will be going to four-day workweeks and telecommuting. With gas costs soaring, the idea of working from home and working a four-day week is gaining increasing acceptance. While some people may chafe at more regulations, as gas goes past $5 a gallon and the need to conserve fossil fuels becomes a matter of national security, we may well see government applying pressure to business to reduce the workweek and shift workers who could work remotely back home, at least one day a week.
The math makes compelling sense: say a city has 100,000 commuters. 50,000 of these could be shifted to a four-day week. 25,000 could also telecommute one day a week. So that's 150,000 commutes a week that don't need to happen (counting to and from work). Figuring from a base of one million commutes a week, that's a 15% reduction in commuter traffic. If each commute burns a gallon of gas, that's 150,000 gallons a week, which translates into a savings of $750,000 a week, or $39 million a year those commuters could save or drop into other parts of the local economy. Those numbers were easy to blow off during prosperous times when gas was cheap, but will become increasingly difficult for policymakers to ignore as gas prices climb.
Good news: our air is going to be getting a little cleaner. As gas prices rise and people drive less and shop less, that translates into fewer car trips, shorter car trips, and fewer truck-miles. People will also have a stronger incentive to retire old, gas-guzzling, high-emission vehicles and replace them with newer, low-emission vehicles. That in turn means less air pollution.
Good news: we're going to be getting into better shape. The bicycle, often arrogantly dismissed outside of college campuses as the means of transport of paupers over the past couple decades, is coming back into style. Look for more bicycles to be made, and for cities and towns to increasingly take bicycle and pedestrian traffic into account when planning cities and making changes to existing plans. Once the public feels the numerous benefits of physical exercise, look for bicycling to nearby attractions to become an outing and leisure activity in its own right.
Good news: home improvement, home decorating and home design will be growth industries. We're going to be spending less time getting away from home, and more time enjoying our homes. Thus, home will once again be the hearth, the focus of familial activities. The drive to make the home a place to live rather than spend the year commuting away from it and the summer vacationing away from it will strengthen over the next decade. Saturday afternoon barbecues and Christmas dinners will return. Everything from exotic plants to softer furniture to PlayStation 3s will be in demand as more nights and weekends are spent "in."
Good news: normal people will be able to own homes again. After two decades of housing prices absurdly inflated by cheap commutes and easy credit, pricing is on its way back down to Earth. The housing bubble still has quite a ways--at least another year or so--to deflate, with rising gas prices, layoffs and more foreclosures on the way. Even renters will see some relief, as homeowners "on the margins" of foreclosure rent out rooms and their second homes that they can't unload at anything close to the rate they paid for them, thereby increasing the supply of rentals and decreasing the price.
Good news: political reform will come sooner rather than later. I think we'll see changes across the board, but the area I'm thinking of is how we treat the poor. America has become polarized into two camps. The first camp, often referred to as "conservatives," believes the poor are poor because they want to be, and that sharing resources is bad because that will just encourage poor people to be lazy. The fact that many of these poor are in fact working seems to matter little to people on this side of the issue. The second camp, often referred to as "liberals," believes that is we take money from somewhere, create a bureaucracy, and hand out money from on high, the poor's predicament will be resolved. The dismal record of inefficiency most social welfare programs have doesn't factor in to these folks' calculations.
The 20th century showed us neither scorning nor subsidizing the poor seemed to work too well. The coming decline will force us to look beyond these ossified notions, because there are going to be too many poor people to just ignore, and the government, already hip-deep in debt, isn't going to be in a position to offer much more aid than it already does. I don't claim to know exactly what solution will be arrived at. Given that the political Establishment seems to be without a clue as to the kind of world we're headed for, my educated guess is that this new approach will be communal, bottom-up, grass-roots driven, and do an end run around conservative and liberal politicians alike. By 2012, I predict the American two-party duopoly is going to come under unprecedented pressure to do something it's quite unaccustomed to: stop posturing and start delivering results.
Good news: we're going to be slowing down. Cheap oil and easy credit energized our lives and helped us move faster, but somehow we just never got ahead. We couldn't ever get where we were going quite fast enough. If we moved a little quicker, the clock just seemed to speed up a bit, and we ended up just as far behind. But if we have fewer places to go and less ability to get there, it stands to reason we'll be racing the clock less, and stopping to enjoy life a little more.
The unchallenged control the clock holds over us Americans is actually a fairly recent invention. For 99% of the human race's history, the time of day was "sunrise," "morning," "noon," "afternoon," and "gonna be dark soon." I'm not seeing us return to that level, but I do believe the pace of life is going to shift to a lower gear as we focus less on where we "have to" be, and more on where we are.
Good news: the concept of community is going to undergo a revival. As our lives become more local, and we focus on where we are, we're going to begin to notice (as our elders did a couple generations ago) the people we share that locality with: also known as neighbors. The block party is going to come back into vogue, as is the park where kids used to play kick-the-can, trick-or-treating on Halloween, and so forth. This represents another downshift in political culture, as the nation and state, strapped for resources, recede into the background and the community and town become more important...as they once were.
Good news: spirituality is going to experience a revival as well. It's a truism noted throughout human history: during prosperous times, people turn from the spiritual to the physical, and when times get hard, people look for spiritual answers to the questions of life. (In the interest of being nonpartisan and unbiased, I'm not going to speculate here which specific spiritual traditions and faiths will enjoy growth--at this point in time, it's too early to tell anyway.) Likely it will vary widely by location and culture, because during the era of cheap, global travel, we imported quite a few faiths and traditions, and America has developed some of its own.
All of this isn't to say that we're not going to be having some trying times ahead. We're headed for turbulence the likes of which we haven't seen since the 1930s. That old Chinese curse, "may you live in interesting times," is definitely coming to fruition. Our nation may not survive, if things go badly and (more importantly) if we react badly. We could see America splinter into regions a la Jericho, if too many people opt for a "last man standing" war over dwindling oil and resources. But it doesn't have to be that way, if we keep our wits about us and see the positive in the changes that are to come.

5 comments:
damn...I was feeling optimistic until you pointed me to Clusterfuck Nation..I stopped reading that page last winter as I literally went into a depression over it all. Don't ever go Life After the Oil Crash, you'll just cry.
Sometimes I believe that bigoil/bigbankers who basically run the planet have thwarted renewable energy discoveries such as zeropoint energy because it's basically a free and abundant resource, can't make profit on something that lasts forever and is a part of nature. In any case, I make this prediction here and now: in the future, credit scores are going to be irrelevant. And that makes me smile.
Cheers!
I actually read Life After the Oil Crash a couple times a week. The site is definitely tilted to the Doomer perspective, and some of what's there borders on tinfoil hattery. However, the basic case of Peak Oil is well-researched.
The problem I see with the Doomer perspective on oil depletion is that it underestimates human ingenuity and the adaptability of the American economic and social model. We have substantial capacity to conserve, to change ways, to invest in higher-mileage cars, and so forth. We already produce far more GDP per unit of energy input than we did twenty years ago.
This isn't to say that adjustment isn't going to be painful at times. At extremes, people are going to die. But human beings have a tendency to see doom in what is actually just profound, wrenching, involuntary change.
If you read LATOC then you probably have TheOilDrum bookmarked...that page I can handle daily. Today on CNBC Boone Pickens was touting his new energy plan, and this afternoon, NPR was also speaking of massive solar energy plans that could have our country almost entirely electrified by the sun so long as congress passes a bill that allows federal land to be utilized this way. Any day I expect to see bumper stickers that say "Jimmy Carter Was Right". . . ! These things give me hope.
The thing that Doomers don't get is that this "long emergency" won't feel so threatening as it happens incrementally and we humans adapt when push comes to shove. I've known about Peak oil for about four years now -- I'm a TU at DailyKos and I read every one of Jerome's countdown to $100 barrel oil. In 06, I would have sworn on a stack of bibles that if gas ever got to $4 a gallon, our economy would collapse and yet here we are working even harder hanging on for dear life. I'm surprised --pleasantly -- that faced with $4 gas I have learned how to save more money than spend it. Between hyper-miling, strategizing my grocery shopping, rescheduling my work so that I'm not at one end of town to another every day, and making my home as energy efficient as possible (between blankets and a clothesline, I'm saving almost a hundred a month on electric)I am actually enjoying a better quality of life. We can't control to much in life but we can definitely control our energy footprint, and being in control is the ultimate human desire, no?
Now if only I could control the loan officer at the DoE.
Excellent points, louminotti. This is the weakness in the Doomer argument: mainly, the idea we're just going to take this oil shortage lying down. We're not.
However, I don't think we're out of the woods, or that the Doomer scenario of civilization collapse is impossible. I consider it to be an outlier, on the bottom fringe of possibilities for the future.
Let's consider all the possibilities for what the world will look like in 2050. There's the upper 10% or so of possible futures: environmental problems are solved through nanotech and zero-point energy and a dozen other breakthroughs. Global warming was greatly overrates and turned out to be a transient-pulse type response to solar output, and temperatures were flat. Democracy (or a reasonable facsimile thereof) has spread through most if not all of the world. Infectious disease has been wiped out, and even the AIDS virus has been beaten. Electricity is about a nickel a kilowatt in 2008 dollars. We enjoy a 25-hour workweek yet nevertheless average a $42,000 a year income in constant dollars, with an average life expectancy nearing 100. Oh, and we have flying cars too.
Then there's the bottom 10%. Oil has run out, and America has been carved up by neo-feudal warlords, fielding armies of fanatics in worn-out leather jackets. Most of us are serfs raising crops and tanning leather like it's the 14th century. Global warming has hit with a vengeance, and New York feels a lot like Georgia. One out of every ten women die in childbirth, and two years ago polio made a comeback...
You get the idea. Those are the outlying scenarios. The most likely outcome is no flying cars, but no Mad Max either. Futurology really hasn't changed much since the Sixties, when optimists predicted The Jetsons and pessimists On The Beach.
I'll take the upper 10% outlier for a hundred, Alex....
But then again, I've always fancied myself being all buff in leather and having a crucial tan driving some rigged dune buggy shaking my fist while brandishing my 357 magnum at anyone who gets in my way...whoa! where'd I go there. . .?
Back to reality...I plan on being dead by 2050. Having said that I'm one of those survivor types...there's this great parable I read in LATOC and it goes like this...
"There are two men camping on a mountain and one night a bear approaches their tent. The first man starts putting on his sneakers and his friend says to him, "What are you doing?? You can't outrun that bear!" The first man replies, "I'm not going to outrun the bear, I'm going to outrun you!"
I'm the first man, except I'm a woman, but you get the point. ;-)
Post a Comment